Our Take on Radon

Conclusions based on established science and U.S. EPA soil gas mitigation standards.

We recognize: ​

• Long-term radon exposure can increase the risk of lung cancer.
• Like all lung-cancer, radon-induced lung cancer can lead to death.
• The risk of contracting or dying from radon induced lung cancer is higher for people who smoke. 

We know:

• Lung cancer incidence and deaths from radon develop over many years of repeated exposure.​
• ​​There is no evidence that radon causes lung cancer or lung‑cancer death over short periods of exposure. ​
• Science cannot distinguish a radon‑caused lung cancer from any other cause of lung cancer.
• Using personal stories to suggest that someone developed lung cancer from radon is a tactic, not a scientifically valid fact. 
• Radon is a long‑term health risk, not an immediate danger. Describing it as ‘extremely dangerous’ in an urgent or emergency sense is not supported by science.

​Our goal is clarity, not fear

Instead of fear-based examples used by many, we translate EPA cancer incidence and mortality data into:

• plain percentages
• simple odds
• long‑term context

No dramatic comparisons.
No pressure.
No urgency language.

Our bottom line: ​

• Radon is a long‑term exposure risk, not an emergency. Levels don’t require same‑day decisions.​
• ​Families shouldn’t feel pressured into mitigation before they understand what the radon numbers for their house mean.
• ​Mitigation can be a helpful improvement for many homes, but it should never be driven by fear, urgency, or sales tactics.
• Families​​ deserve space to learn, compare options, and choose what makes sense for them.

The most protective habit — retest every two years

• A radon test is a snapshot — not a lifetime measurement.
• ​Levels drift slowly as homes and soil conditions change.
• ​Keeping eyes on radon over time is the best way to stay informed.

Go Back